![]() 10/19/2015 at 06:28 • Filed to: Spit6 | ![]() | ![]() |
...i’ve finally finished my lower wishbones!
Fully adjustable for camber and toe and as a happy coincidence significantly lighter than even the aftermarket alloy lower wishbone setup :)
In order of weight we have:
Complete cast iron lower wishbone assembly: 6.788kg
Conplete alloy lower wishbone setup: 3.756kg
Complete tubular lower wishbone setup: 2.661kg
I’ve also managed to find a set of alloy 4-pot calipers and vented discs for £110 below retail in need of resealing (3.118 complete in case you were wondering, haven’t weighted the vented discs yet though...)
Oh, and as you can see i’ve been experimenting with an organic leaf spring in an effort to improve on the triumph one ;)
![]() 10/19/2015 at 06:43 |
|
Dat unsprung weight loss doe.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 07:11 |
|
Check this weld again. Please for my sanity. Smack the hell out of it with a slag hammer and make sure it is solid.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 07:15 |
|
Awesome, coming along nicely now. At this rate, should be done by Christmas... 2020 or so.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 08:15 |
|
With any luck yeah ;)
![]() 10/19/2015 at 08:17 |
|
All have been beaten up quite thoroughly to make sure they’ve stuck :)
That one has actually been welded over twice, hence the raised weld...
![]() 10/19/2015 at 09:15 |
|
A lot of the time, poly is an unnecessary step up in stiffness from rubber, but in this case... well, let’s just say you’d have a lot of surprise toe-in change if you didn’t. Given your new setup puts all the toe control on those bushings and the leaf at the top, and doesn’t have any inherent reason/bracing for the lower arm trapezoid shape not to rack this way and that...
![]() 10/19/2015 at 09:59 |
|
Yeah you need as stiff of a setup here as possible :S fingers crossed there aren’t any major issues.
If there are i think i’d need to add one or two arms reaching forwards but that would add weight and complexity...
![]() 10/19/2015 at 10:12 |
|
I know for a fact that some knobheads have used a Jag IRS without the stabilizer links, and with the third-member mounted solidly in place. That’s far more questionable than anything you’re doing, but it’s almost universally on trailer queens, and not anything that sees the track.
A stabilizer forward would cost you your gained kilo, but may end up being necessary. Can’t really say, though - I’m not too worried about the shear force on your through-bolt with a Spit’s modest weight requirements, and that seems the point of greatest difficulty. I should note, though, that your torsion resistance is pretty much all down to the spring, so don’t expect any miracles of your rear brakes. A little caster change under braking and a little under accel wouldn’t be surprising. :X
![]() 10/19/2015 at 10:17 |
|
Drill and tap them for a zerk fitting, otherwise the poly will bind.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 10:34 |
|
Very much this.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 10:35 |
|
What does the penetration look like on the inside of the tube? I swear I’m not trying to be a prick.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 11:39 |
|
The polybushes are meant to be stationary in the eyes, and suspension movement is done by flex in the bush :)
![]() 10/19/2015 at 11:41 |
|
No by all means :) looks good, nice even line of discolouration where i’ve welded but not hot enough to cause a bubble.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 11:50 |
|
Not sure I follow you. What material touches the steel mount points?
![]() 10/19/2015 at 14:40 |
|
The polybushes are pressed into the eyes (just bush against tube) then there’s a metal tube down the centre that will be clamped up inside the chassis brackets (the reason it’s braced on one side but not the other...).
![]() 10/19/2015 at 14:43 |
|
Like these?
If so, yeah, you need grease.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 14:55 |
|
Yeah I don’t expect it to be the last word in stability, but it’s a massive improvement over the built-in changes of the standard suspension...
Not a clever idea there with the Jag IRS. Really not clever.
How’s yours coming btw?
![]() 10/19/2015 at 15:10 |
|
I know they flex or slip in theory, but they do best when greased. Otherwise, partial seizing to the steel through-shaft and squeaking cause no end of trouble. It’s just how poly bushes are. That’s actually covered in your suspension design book, if I’m not mistaken.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 15:14 |
|
Well, the suspension’s pretty much all set in the rear, save for the stabilizing links. I just recently got a set of A-arm bushings for a GM van to go on their front ends (need radial flex capability as well as up/down rotation, and I’ll be making the links themselves from some DOM tubing I’m ordering this week through work. In the meantime , I’ve been working on the fit of those body parts that aren’t supposed to work together, and I’ve pulled the roof skin and back of the cab off.
![]() 10/19/2015 at 15:51 |
|
Another note on the dolt with the Jag suspension on his Chevy, mostly trivia: He’s dropped to a single spring/shock per side because the XJS rear he started with was too heavily sprung, not a surprise. His spring rate, however, would almost certainly have been alright if he’d spent the mere $160 in springs and an afternoon in the garage to swap for Series I E pieces. Entirely new springs, with about the correct response. Nope.
Related note: the swap to XKE springs is something I myself will be doing, when I get a chance.
![]() 10/20/2015 at 17:02 |
|
Nice :) glad to see you’re making progress. I’ve just made a start on notching the chassis to provide clearance for the speedo angle-drive which is one of the last few modifications to the chassis that needs to be done :)
Next up after that is a diff rebuild with a quaife lsd :)
![]() 10/21/2015 at 02:38 |
|
Ah yeah, pretty much that. I’ll grab some as soon as I can :)
![]() 10/21/2015 at 02:39 |
|
Really must read that...
![]() 10/21/2015 at 10:11 |
|
Is it the Herb Adams book?